commentopia

What the World Is Saying

A SERVICE BRINGING YOU THE BEST READERS' COMMENTS

FROM TOP NEWS SOURCES ON THE WEB

ENVIRONMENT

ARCHIVES — APRIL 2010

 

[RETURN TO commentopia HOME PAGE]

Bookmark and Share

 

APRIL 26, 2010 -- MAY 2, 2010

STUDY SHOWS MANY FARMERS REAPING BENEFITS FROM BIOTECH CROPS

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES REPORT

There is a big difference between being "good" vs. "better." Reducing your daily Twinkie consumption from 20 Twinkies to 5 Twinkies is "better" for you, but I don't think anyone would consider it "good" for you. The reduction in fertilizer and pesticide use resulting from GM crops may be "better" than current fertilizer/pesticide use, but that doesn't mean it's "good."

The fact is that insecticides, herbicides, and chemical fertilizer kill things. They kill the soil (in which there can be 20 billion organisms in a cubic foot -- these benefit the plants), the plants (the so-called "weeds" prevent erosion, hold in moisture, and can potentially carry minerals from up to 2 miles away), and the insects (which pollinate our crops and also serve as a mechanism for cultivating healthy, more insect-resistant crops (they do this by attacking the weaker plants and leaving the stronger plants, whose seed you can then use)).

It is sad & ironic that we are killing the system that produces life (and therefore food) in order to produce "food," which I put in quotes because I don't think anyone would eat Bt-corn in its most elemental form (i.e. on the cob).

In ecology and in life, you can never do just one thing. Everything ripples.

Read the article NPR/BioTech crops are good for earth, report finds

<>

I had to laugh when I read about this 'report' and was reminded of similar 'independent' reports that said smoking had no ill effects on human health, or, going back aways, that DDT wasn't bad for you. What next? Will we suddenly hear that the earth really is flat after all, or that it really is only 6000 years old?

I've spoken to many farmers in eastern Oregon and none of them feel comfortable buying Roundup Ready seed...but they feel they have no choice, since Monsanto has cornered the market on every single successful commercial crop. The only way to prevent the adverse effects of Monsanto's products is --whattya know-- to use more Monsanto products. Ah, if only George Orwell were alive today.

Read the article NPR/BioTech crops are good for earth, report finds

<>

I appreciate NPR's courage in coverage of an issue that has become such a sacred cow among many uniformed members of the public. Biotech crops are clearly an environmental and agricultural blessing. As the American Association for the Advancement of Science AND the National Academy of Science report, it can go a long way for producing environmentally-friendly food for the globe's growing population.

It is deeply unfortunate that so many wildly inaccurate claims are promoted by well-meaning folks who clearly don't understand this important issue. The anti-biotech claims add up to the biggest disinformation campaign since the tobacco companies tried to "prove" that smoking is not harmful.

As a quick look at the other comments show, even NPR listeners - who are much better informed than average citizens - have accepted far too many of the crazy biotech myths promoted by members of the brain-dead wing of the environmental sector. Environmental scientists shake their heads in disbelief at the kinds of claims repeated in the comments below.

Read the article NPR/BioTech crops are good for earth, report finds

 

APRIL 12, 2010 -- APRIL 25, 2010

THE GREAT ATLANTIC WIND FARM --POWER TO A SEABOARD GRID?

PNAS PROCEEDINGS

Offshore wind farms don't kill many (if any) birds.

One of the major benefits of offshore wind farms is that propeller size isn't limited to what can be carried on the back of a tractor trailer. Offshore props built at waterside factories can be built to truly massive sizes.

Large propellers generate more power with slower blade speed. The slower blade rotation means that birds can very easily avoid them.

Regarding NIMBY objections, most of these proposed farms are well off shore, out of the sight lines of the coastal areas. This isn't just being done to avoid the NIMBY factor, but because winds are higher further offshore.

Read the article ARS TECHNICA/It looks like time to build an Atlantic seaboard wind grid

<>

Read European studies where they are more advanced than here in the US re wind power. When alternative power sources (wind or solar) exceed about 15% of total capacity you start to run into problems with lack of sustainability during periods of low wind/insolation. This requires very expensive back -up non renewable capacity. In fact more expensive than if it was the principle source. The point is however the US is nowhere near that 15% figure. We should be doing more wind and solar at this time.

Read the article SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN/String of offshore turbines off the East Coast could provide a steady supply of wind power

 

APRIL 5, 2010 -- APRIL 11, 2010

DID TOADS TUMBLE TO ITALIAN TREMBLOR?

 

I think it needs rather more than observations regarding just one toad colony to justify such an elaborate theory being taken seriously.

Take the following...

"Looking for clues to explain the toads' behaviour, Grant found that scientists had noticed disruptions in the ionosphere, the uppermost electromagnetic layer of the earth's atmosphere, at the time of the L'Aquila earthquake, which the toads may have detected."

For this to be true, then it is not only postulating that toads can detect disruptions in the ionosphere, but that these disruptions in the ionosphere are associated in some way with an imminent earthquake.

Frankly this looks like little more than random speculation at this stage. If toads are able to forecast earthquakes or disruptions in the ionosphere can are associated with earthquakes (or the ability of toads to sense them) then this ought to lead to some testable hypothesis. As it stands, this just looks like associating arbitrary events after the event. Maybe there is something in the release of ground gases theory, but at the moment this is more appropriate to "New Age" than "New Scientist".

Read the article THE GUARDIAN/ Toads able to detect earthquakes days beforehand, says study

<>

I realize biologists may not <always> be held to the same quantitative standards as physicists and geophysicists, but really, extreme caution is warranted when extrapolating outside one's area of expertise.

For decades now, geophysicists have carefully examined radon gas emissions, geomagnetic and geoelectric fields, strain rates, stress measurements, and microseismic records before and after many significant earthquakes. The consensus at this point is that there are NO statistically significant recognizable precursors in the short term (days to months) before large earthquakes.

The non-deterministic nature of earthquake triggering mechanisms makes this a reasonable conclusion. Stress builds up over many years and <will> be released. However the precise location and timing of the main stress release is subject to many complex factors, and is likely to remain unpredictable.

So odd behaviour of a single toad colony 74 km away from the L'Aquila epicentre? Nice try, but no.

  Read the article THE REGISTER/Italian toads predicted L'Aquila earthquake

 

MARCH 29, 2010 -- APRIL 4, 2010

BUDGET THREAT: A PLAGUE OF GRASSHOPPERS ON THE HORIZON?

Kill the grasshoppers? Ridiculous. One man's pest is another man's food.

Here is the nutritional value of 100 grams of grasshopper:

Protein: 20 gms
Fat: 6 gms
Carbs: 4 gms
Calories: 150

Here is the nutritional value of 100 grams of corn:

Protein (nutritionally incomplete): 3 gms
Fat: 1 gm
Carbs: 20 gms
Calories: 100

But for our ignorance and arrogance, we would be celebrating a grasshopper invasion, and setting up massive nets to capture and eat them. Instead we spread toxic pesticides that not only kill a wonderful food source, but poison us and our environment. Dumb.

Roy Mankovitz, Director
http://www.MontecitoWellness.com

Read the article WALL STREET JOURNAL/Day of the grasshopper looms

<>

I can tell you that the grasshoppers add a new dimension to riding a motorcycle through Montana, Wyoming, etc. Last grass hopper season, I made sure I had the full face helmet and full body leather on as they were bouncing off the windshield and faceshield of the helmet at a rate like rain in a downpour.


It was in early August when they were harvesting the grains in eastern Montana along Highway 2, parallel to the Canadian border.

It is truly a creepy feeling to see dark swarming groups of these grass hoppers, which are probably 2" to 4" long and as you ride into them, they either bounce off the helmet or the ones with the wrong trajectory stick to your face shield and ooze. They have a unique snapping sound as they smack into your helmet and leather riding gear. When you see millions of them together, they have an entirely different look than encountering the occasional one in your backyard.

For those interested in eating them go right ahead. Not for me. I have seen photos where some similar type of critter is cooked on Hibachis in China and sold on sticks. No thanks.

Read the article WALL STREET JOURNAL/Day of the grasshopper looms

 

EARTH HOUR: IS AN HOUR OF DARKNESS A BRIGHT IDEA?

The Earth Hour Logo

Are your candles made from petroleum, palm oil, or beeswax?

In my view, using candles for a purported ecological benefit is a misguided exercise in Luddism. You're probably burning petroleum, and candles produce quite a lot of heat (and therefore consume a quite a lot of energy) for the amount of light produced.

You're better off with those hand-crank rechargeable LED flashlights they sell for $10-15.

Me? I'll probably be basking in the energy-efficient glow of my LED-backlit laptop display, reflecting on how nice it is that my electric supply is 84% non-fossil and that I live in a very mild climate zone where I don't need to use my heating in late March or have air-conditioning at all.

Read the article HUFFINGTON POST/Earth Hour 2010: How to keep busy during an hour of darkness

 

The Sky Tower in Auckland, New Zealand, switched off its usual floodlighting during the Earth Hour, and re-lit afterwards. Wikipedia

 

This year for "Earth Hour" I plan to turn on every electrically powered device I own. I may even start my vehicle and let it idle. I hope others follow and show the world that they do not buy into the propaganda of the "FernGully Generation." Perhaps these efforts will allow for the disenchantment of society from the unfettered dogma pushed by today's psuedo-scientists and celebrity icons. Maybe, just maybe, the facade of this "inconvenient truth" is the notoriety, the tenure, and the creation of a new market to capitalize--going green.

Read the article LOS ANGELES TIMES/Earth Hour is March 27

BLACK DAY FOR BLUEFIN

Northern bluefin tuna, via Wikipedia

 

If we can't agree on reduced catches and sales of Bluefin Tuna, nature will impose them by reduced stocks of fish. The commercial fishing will exploit the resource until it becomes unprofitable for most boats because there are too few fish left. Same old, sad story in ocean conservation--what Hardin called the tragedy of the commons.

Read the article NEW YORK TIMES/U.N. rejects export ban on Atlantic bluefin tuna.

<>

The irony is that the Japanese are consuming less tuna (including blue fin) each year, with market prices on a declining trend. One can even say that there is "tuna glut", with consumers viewing tuna flesh as just another commodity. I must point out that the Japanese government's decision to "go all out to stop the measure or else exempt itself from complying with it", as the article mentions, is not exactly based on a consensus among its citizens. I, for one, would not mind paying higher prices for tuna; it's high time that all consumers (not just the Japanese, mind you) started paying for the true cost of their actions.

Read the article NEW YORK TIMES/U.N. rejects export ban on Atlantic bluefin tuna.

 

<>

I've tried pointing out the simple maths of overfishing to small boat trawlers and there is almost no getting through to them.


"If we don't catch them, somebody else will." is their undying mantra and one that is clearly chanted throughout the industry.


If it wasn't so toweringly stupid it might almost be funny.
The proposal shouldn't be given up on though. By May 2011 the evidence of their increasingly empty nets may start to filter through into their krill sized brains.
Otherwise a tuna war is on the way.

Read the articleU.K. GUARDIAN/Bluefin fails to make U.N. list of protected fish

Northern bluefin tuna, sashimi, via Wikipedia

Canada has learned its lesson well. Agreements to limit fishing in the North Atlantic years ago were obeyed by Canada, but the EU turned a blind eye to the massive overfishing by EU factory ships off the coast of Newfoundland.

Canadian fishermen were banned from fishing off our own coasts while EU trawlers swept the oceans clear of everything moving just outside our territorial limits. Complaints to the EU were ignored.

The EU taught that signed agreements don't hold any force when dealing with the Europeans. Why sign if the only ones obeying are ourselves?

Read the article U.K. GUARDIAN/Bluefin fails to make U.N. list of protected fish

 

back to home page

read more comments from THE INDEX

©2009-2010 Commentopia

 

 

 

ARCHIVES -- MARCH, 2010

ARCHIVES -- FEBRUARY, 2010

ARCHIVES -- JANUARY, 2010

ARCHIVES -- OCTOBER, 2009 — DECEMBER, 2009

ARCHIVES --  JULY, 2009 — SEPTEMBER, 2009